Glyphosate enables carbon sequestration

Article from the Canadian Agronomist

On a 2,470 acre (1000 ha) farm, the net increase in carbon sequestration due to these farming practices was equivalent to the emissions of 432 cars.

Over the last 30+ years, Prairie farmers have moved away from a cropping system that used intensive tillage and summerfallow to control weeds to a no-till system that reduced fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, and improved soil quality. This has resulted in a net increase in carbon sequestration in agricultural Prairie soils.

A multi-year, Canadian Prairie-wide farm survey was set up to examine the relationship between genetically modified, herbicide-tolerant crop adoption, glyphosate use, and soil carbon sequestration due to changes in Saskatchewan crop farmers’ land management practices over the past 30 years.

An online survey of Saskatchewan crop farmers was conducted between November 2020 and April 2021. The survey covered two time periods, 1991–1994 and 2016–2019, to determine how their practices changed over the past 25 years. The survey covered all aspects of crop production from seeding to harvest including crop inputs such as chemicals and fertilizer, and equipment use. It also asked farmers how herbicide-tolerant crops, GM crops, and glyphosate facilitated the adoption of conservation tillage and reduced summerfallow.

Carbon sequestration was estimated with a carbon accounting framework incorporating coefficients derived from the Century Model.

Farming practices would change without glyphosate

The survey found that farmers felt that glyphosate was the greatest reason they were able to reduce tillage and summerfallow, rated at 9 on a scale of 1-10, followed by herbicide-tolerant canola at 7.3.

Currently, herbicide-tolerant canola is grown on virtually all canola acres in western Canada. If herbicide-tolerant crops were removed from the market, farmers said 23% of their land would have to go back to summerfallow compared to 1% that is currently in summerfallow. In the absence of herbicide-tolerant crops, the survey found that the most common changes in farming practices would be a change in chemical use (30%), a decrease in yield and profitability (28%), a change in crop rotation (21%), an increase in tillage (20%), and reversion to summerfallow (11%).

Going further, if glyphosate use was discontinued in Saskatchewan, farmers reported having to increase tillage (54%), incur a decrease in yield and profitability (37%), change chemical use (23%), and revert to summerfallow (14%). Four percent said that they would not continue farming without glyphosate.

From net emitter to net sequesterer

From 1991-1994, the annual net change in soil organic carbon (SOC) from tillage was estimated at -0.02 Mg/ha/year. This accounted for a net change in SOC from tillage at -278,624 Mg/year on the 15.2 million Saskatchewan cropped acres, indicating that soils released more C from tillage than was sequestered. Annual net SOC gains from the removal of summerfallow from 1991-1994, was +0.03 Mg/ha/year, indicating a slight reduction in summerfallow acres during that time period.

By reducing tillage practices in the time period 2016-2019, annual net change in SOC was +0.12 Mg/ha/year. The annual net change in SOC from eliminating summerfallow was +0.42 Mg/ha/year, indicating that carbon was being sequestered in the soil.

Extrapolating those results to a 2,470 acre (1000) hectare farm, and to the province of Saskatchewan, the annual change in SOC for Saskatchewan from a decrease in tillage was +1,806,192 Mg/year, and an additional +6,402,075 Mg/year for a reduction in summerfallow practices.

Net SOC gains (Mg/year) from changes in tillage and summerfallow practices

Related articles